U.S. flag An official website of the United States government

On Oct. 1, 2024, the FDA began implementing a reorganization impacting many parts of the agency. We are in the process of updating FDA.gov content to reflect these changes.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  1. Home
  2. Food
  3. News & Events from HFP
  4. HFP Constituent Updates
  5. FDA Denies Qualified Health Claim Petition for Intake of Vitamin D to Reduce the Risk of Multiple Sclerosis in Healthy People
  1. HFP Constituent Updates

FDA Denies Qualified Health Claim Petition for Intake of Vitamin D to Reduce the Risk of Multiple Sclerosis in Healthy People

Constituent Update

January 12, 2017

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today denied a request for use of a qualified health claim that consumption of vitamin D may reduce the risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic autoimmune disorder that damages the body’s central nervous system.

The FDA thoroughly reviewed the 85 publications submitted by the Burdock Group on behalf of Bayer, as well as all the publications cited in the petition’s appendix. The agency also conducted a vast independent literature review of hundreds of additional publications. Through this rigorous assessment, the FDA determined that scientific conclusions could not be drawn about the relationship between vitamin D intake and MS risk. Based on the agency’s review of the totality of publicly available scientific evidence, the FDA has concluded that there is no credible evidence of a relationship between intake of vitamin D and a reduced risk of MS.

Qualified health claims are claims supported by credible scientific evidence, but do not meet the more rigorous “significant scientific agreement” standard required for an authorized health claim. As such, qualified health claims must be accompanied by a disclaimer or other qualifying language so that the level of scientific evidence supporting the claim is accurately communicated.

In the case of this qualified health claim petition, because there is no credible scientific evidence to support the claim, the claim is misleading and no disclaimer or qualifying language could mitigate the misleading concerns of the claim itself to prevent consumer misunderstanding.

Note that scientific information is subject to change, as are consumer consumption patterns. As new information becomes available, FDA is open to assessing whether it necessitates a change in this decision.

For More Information

Back to Top