U.S. flag An official website of the United States government

On Oct. 1, 2024, the FDA began implementing a reorganization impacting many parts of the agency. We are in the process of updating FDA.gov content to reflect these changes.

  1. Home
  2. Science & Research
  3. About Science & Research at FDA
  4. The FDA Science Forum
  5. Clinical Assessment of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers as a Medical Countermeasure
  1. The FDA Science Forum

2021 FDA Science Forum

Clinical Assessment of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers as a Medical Countermeasure

Authors:
Poster Author(s)
Sullivan, Stacey JL, CDRH/OSEL/DAM
Rinaldi, Jean E, CDRH/OSEL/DAM
Hariharan, Prasanna, CDRH/OSEL/DAM
Casamento, Jon P, CDRH/OSEL/DAM
Baek, Seungchul, UMBC/COEIT
Seay, Nathanael, UMBC/COEIT
Vesnovsky, Oleg, CDRH/OSEL/DAM
Topoleski, L.D. Timmie, CDRH/OSEL/DAM and UMBC/COEIT
Center:
Contributing Office
Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Abstract

Poster Abstract

Background

Non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) are widely used during disease outbreaks as a temperature-measurement tool for screening the general public, travelers at ports of entry, and isolating patients in healthcare and other settings.

Methods

A clinical study was conducted with 1113 adult subjects using six different commercially available NCIT models to assess their temperature measurement accuracy. A total of 60 NCITs were tested with 10 units for each model. The NCIT-measured temperature was compared with the oral reference temperature.

Results

The mean difference between the oral reference thermometer and NCIT measurement (clinical bias) was different for each NCIT model. The clinical bias ranged from just under -0.9 °C (under-reporting) to just over +0.2 °C (over-reporting). The majority of the individual measurement differences ranged between -2 °C and +1 °C with extreme cases ranging from -3 °C to +2 °C. Depending upon the NCIT model, 48% to 88% of the individual temperature measurements were outside the labeled accuracy stated by the manufacturers. The sensitivity, which ranges from 0 (no detection) to 1 (ideal detection), of the NCIT models for detecting a subject’s temperature above 38 °C ranged from 0 to 0.69.

Conclusions

Overall, our results indicated that the tested NCIT devices may not be consistently accurate enough to determine if a subject’s temperature exceeds a specific threshold (e.g., 38 °C). Inter-model variability and intra-model accuracy of the displayed temperature were found to be outside of acceptable limits. Accuracy and credibility of NCITs should be more thoroughly investigated in future studies before considering them as an effective screening tool. The findings and conclusions in this study have not been formally disseminated by the Food and Drug Administration and should not be construed to represent any Agency determination or policy. Funding for this study was provided by FDA’s Medical Countermeasures Initiative.


Poster Image
Preview image of the scientific poster. For more information, please refer to the abstract or download the PDF version of the poster.

Download the Poster (PDF; 0.55 MB)

Back to Top